Mr. Speaker, the Democrat leadership is not starting out the year on the right foot. Rather than demonstrating to the American people that the House of Representatives is a body of open debate and free thinking, they are bringing a modified closed rule on H.R. 3425 to the floor, limiting debate on one of the first pieces of legislation of the session. Why are they doing this? Well, it seems they are afraid that a certain amendment that has widespread support throughout the country-- but does not quite coincide with their particular philosophical views-- would likely pass if brought up in the House. It is the Mica amendment, which would require a cost-benefit analysis to accompany regulations proposed by the EPA. Despite the fact that it was passed in the other body by a vote of 95-3, the House is not even being permitted to consider it. The Mica amendment is very timely in light of the fact that just yesterday the EPA announced its plan to develop a national strategy for the use of chlorine and chlorine compounds.
Porter Goss: “Mr. Speaker, the Democrat leadership is not starting out the year on the right foot. Rather than demonstrating to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Mr. DeLay criticizes the Democrat leadership for limiting debate on legislation and discusses the Mica amendment related to EPA regulations.
Share
More from Porter Goss
With this capture, many lingering questions will be answered, but we cannot forget that Saddam has engaged in deceit and deception for decades.
certainly we will publicly not commit to that. We will publicly commit to where the review of the information takes us. We have a bipartisan agreement on that. We have 20 able members who are members of good judgment and good sense who…
we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill conference. This language was already firmly rejected once by this body, and I believe we should make it well known that we…





