my concern with this amendment is quite simple: while well intentioned, I think it undermines our efforts in the war on drugs. This amendment would end the ability of State law enforcement agencies to purchase equipment needed specifically for the war on drugs and the fight against terrorism. While the phrase ``war on drugs'' tends to bring to mind images of jungles in Latin America, the reality is that it is fought everyday on our streets, in our schoolyards and playgrounds. Vivid proof of this came a few years ago in my southwest Florida district--the regional office of the Drug Enforcement Agency was blown up by individuals involved in drug trafficking. Allowing the Defense Department to sell appropriate surplus equipment to law enforcement agencies ensures they have the tools they need to counter this very real threat. I encourage my colleagues to reject the Sanford amendment.
Porter Goss: “my concern with this amendment is quite simple: while well intentioned, I think it undermines our efforts in the war on…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about an amendment related to law enforcement and the war on drugs.
Share
More from Porter Goss
I think everybody is recalculating their view of the speaker. He called Hastert's actions inexcusable, not acceptable to any of the parties involved.
I am obviously here to join my colleagues in honoring the memory of those who died in the terrorist attacks of a year ago this day and to underscore with gratitude the amazing valor displayed by them. I am sure every American remembers…
Mr. Speaker, in consideration of the fiscal year 2005 Defense Authorization Act, this comes at a benchmark moment for the United States of America, if not the world, in terms of our history. Our Nation and our allies are engaged in a…
we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill conference. This language was already firmly rejected once by this body, and I believe we should make it well known that we…





