Political Quotes

Porter Goss: my concern with this amendment is quite simple: while well intentioned, I think it undermines our efforts in the war on…

On the recordMay 18, 2000
my concern with this amendment is quite simple: while well intentioned, I think it undermines our efforts in the war on drugs. This amendment would end the ability of State law enforcement agencies to purchase equipment needed specifically for the war on drugs and the fight against terrorism. While the phrase ``war on drugs'' tends to bring to mind images of jungles in Latin America, the reality is that it is fought everyday on our streets, in our schoolyards and playgrounds. Vivid proof of this came a few years ago in my southwest Florida district--the regional office of the Drug Enforcement Agency was blown up by individuals involved in drug trafficking. Allowing the Defense Department to sell appropriate surplus equipment to law enforcement agencies ensures they have the tools they need to counter this very real threat. I encourage my colleagues to reject the Sanford amendment.
Said by
Porter Goss
Florida

Editor's note · Context

Addressing concerns about an amendment related to law enforcement and the war on drugs.

Share

More from Porter Goss

Apr 27, 2016

I think everybody is recalculating their view of the speaker. He called Hastert's actions inexcusable, not acceptable to any of the parties involved.

transcripts.cnn.com
Sep 11, 2002

I am obviously here to join my colleagues in honoring the memory of those who died in the terrorist attacks of a year ago this day and to underscore with gratitude the amazing valor displayed by them. I am sure every American remembers…

govinfo.gov
May 19, 2004

Mr. Speaker, in consideration of the fiscal year 2005 Defense Authorization Act, this comes at a benchmark moment for the United States of America, if not the world, in terms of our history. Our Nation and our allies are engaged in a…

govinfo.gov
Oct 8, 2003

we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill conference. This language was already firmly rejected once by this body, and I believe we should make it well known that we…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation