I hope that people here and people watching on C-SPAN have a sense of what is going on. We are debating a rule, and what that rule does, it prevents the Democrats from offering a prescription drug coverage bill. That is what the rule does. Now, why would the Republican leadership want to do that rule? Think about that for a second. The reason they want that rule is it might pass, the Democratic proposal might pass if offered. And so, by this rule, the Democratic option will not be available. Why not? Well, the Republican proposal, specifically when we get into what it does, literally destroys Medicare. It changes Medicare from a universal mandatory health care system for seniors to a selective system only for seniors who are at 130 percent of poverty. So the broad-based political support that we have for Social Security and Medicare would end, and the things that we have done to sustain Medicare would end. Mr. Speaker, the issue of a voucher part of the program would also be part of the Republican proposal, fundamentally different than what the Democrats are trying to do. Finally, very quickly, in closing I say that, in 1965, Medicare would not have been passed if the Republicans were in charge. It will not pass in the year 2000 with the Republican majority.
Peter Deutsch: “I hope that people here and people watching on C-SPAN have a sense of what is going on. We are debating a rule, and what…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating a rule that prevents Democrats from offering a prescription drug coverage bill.
Share
More from Peter Deutsch
I too join with my colleague in supporting this resolution, but also speaking out really to help educate our colleagues in the country about the 200th adversary of Haitian Flag Day. It is a significant event, the bicentennial of the second…
Absolutely correct. I think it is important just in terms of the issue of why is Israel there as a modern state. I keep referring to it as the modern state of Israel. The British in 1922 actually divided the mandate that they had along the…
As we reviewed them, we asked exactly those questions. Some of them were stolen Israeli weapons. Some of them were American weapons stolen or gotten through a third party. A lot of them were smuggled either through the tunnels from the…
I am very much in support of many provisions in the bill, but the rule, unfortunately, specifically in terms of not protecting two very significant issues on Everglades restoration, I urge my colleagues to look, understand the rule, and…





