I am very much in support of many provisions in the bill, but the rule, unfortunately, specifically in terms of not protecting two very significant issues on Everglades restoration, I urge my colleagues to look, understand the rule, and urge defeat of the rule for those very specific and unfortunate nonprotection issues. Those are the only two issues where points of order are not waived. It was a very conscious, very specific decision that was made in the Committee on Rules. Members need to understand the specifics about what, and we are getting on some local, local issues. One of the provisions which has been mentioned deals with the Department of Interior representation in the process to determine literally how $8 billion is going to be spent. There is a real concern that that component, without the Department of Interior's involvement, is going to lead to results that this Congress does not want. If we pass the rule, that provision will be taken out. There has been incredible bipartisan support, people on both sides of the aisle have spoken against the rule for this very reason.
Peter Deutsch: “I am very much in support of many provisions in the bill, but the rule, unfortunately, specifically in terms of not…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the rule affecting Everglades restoration during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Peter Deutsch
This is going to be the last document and there is more, but this is dated March 24, 2002, and during the stage of these operations, and this is a copy of minutes of a meeting at the Ramallah headquarters, and Chairman Arafat is in…
the House bill in front of us, as the ranking Democrat of our full committee has ably quoted the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means in his own words, ``To those who say the bill would end Medicare as we know it, the answer is we…
Let me read, these are different Members, every quote so far this evening has been from a different Member. I will read from another Member: ``We in this body have a constitutional responsibility to protect the national security of the…
But it is interesting, much has been made in terms of who voted against it, why they voted against it, but there were Democrats and Republicans. Again, less than 15 percent of the Congress, but I am going to quote from one of our…





