I find that to be extremely troubling.

I am just not sure that a country that violates just about every international norm should be invited into an international organization because that doesn't necessarily change attitudes.

We know that they are--even with the minor amounts of money that has been lessened from the sanctions regime...

We are being asked to trust that we are going to be fully consulted.

By allowing a U.S. bank a general license to move this money offshore, it is in essence allowing them access to the U.S. dollar.

Secretary Kerry implied that Iran deserves the benefit of the agreement they struck.

The President has said that, if it came down to it, that the United States would do that if it were necessary.

I do not think there is congruence right now, on the administration level.

If Israel conducts an airstrike against a physical facility, does this deal, the way I read it, does it require us to help Iran protect and respond to that threat?

We are called to lead on this matter.

it is my understanding that the U.S. sanctions are the biggest piece of the sanctions in place that have the greatest impact.

I want to understand whether or not this alternative mechanism is allowed or not under this agreement.