Marco Rubio

It seems to me the administration has placed many, many caveats on what we will not do.

I have supported the training and arming of these rebels for some time.

I hope that what we are going to end up with is more than a group of coat holders.

I was shocked yesterday to hear that in the Armed Services testimony these rebels are actually going to be used against ISIS.

Well, it is not a hypothetical. It is actually--it appears to be, quite frankly, we are relying on a military strategy built on rebels.

I am fully in favor of auto-enrollment pension plans, but less-educated workers are less likely to be offered pensions on the job.

ICANN must prevent governments from exercising undue influence over Internet governance.

The alternative--permitting Iran a large nuclear infrastructure--strikes me as imprudent and unlikely to succeed in the face of Iranian determination to advance its nuclear weapons capability.

Congress should insist that nuclear facilities built in violation of Iran's NPT obligations be dismantled; this is important not only for regional stability, but for the integrity of the nonproliferation regime globally.

I just think the danger here is quite frank.

There is only one reason why you develop a rocket like that and that is to put a nuclear warhead on it.

They have stopped the momentum on more sanctions. They have made future sanctions even harder.

We wanted to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. That was our hope.

They wanted to achieve the maximum amount of sanctions relief that they could get without having to agree to any irreversible concessions on their nuclear program.

A deal of this sort would have potentially negative implications for U.S. interests in the Middle East and beyond.

We have implicitly agreed that they now have a right to enrich at any level.

The only thing worse than war is crazy people with a nuclear weapon that can reach the United States of America on a rocket.

This entire thing is a disaster. It is not just an embarrassing diplomatic failure; this is a dangerous national security failure.

I think that that is incredibly naive.

They are a state sponsor of terrorism. There is no nation on Earth that uses terrorism more than they do as an element of statecraft.

What has been the delay in issuing that interim final rule?

Will Secretary Pritzker or you on her behalf--will you make clear here today that you commit to implementing the oil spill impact formula as is written in the law?

So when can we expect that?

The Gulf Coast deserves our attention and our resources.

I think it is going to be important for Floridians that we get plans moving.