This whole issue is fascinating to me because the story of humanity is the story of technological advances from the very beginning in every civilization and culture.

I think what scares people about this technology is the belief that it not simply holds the promise of making us better, but the threat of potentially replacing the human.

you don't want to act and unilaterally disarm

What I think is important to reiterate is you don't need the state of the art for it to be adopted internally for your decision-making.

This whole issue is fascinating to me because the story of humanity is the story of technological advances from the very beginning in every civilization and culture.

I think what scares people about this technology is the belief that it not simply holds the promise of making us better, but the threat of potentially replacing the human.

you don't want to act and unilaterally disarm

What I think is important to reiterate is you don't need the state of the art for it to be adopted internally for your decision-making.

I do worry about those implications.

I do worry about those implications.

What I think is important to reiterate is you don't need the state of the art for it to be adopted internally for your decision-making.

But can we ever find ourselves at a disadvantage facing an adversary who did not place those limits?