I stand today to say that I support the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Davis). This is a project that, in fact, is going to be completed by this winter, about 753 miles long. The fact of the matter is that in my district, because this comes through my district, it was controversial. FERC held public hearings at which the concerns of these interested citizens were heard. In response, Gulfstream modified the pipeline plan and now FERC is reviewing the revised plan. So I do not think there is really a legitimate reason at this time for the House to stop this process, and I think that is what this amendment actually would do and why we are here.
Karen Thurman: “I stand today to say that I support the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Davis). This is a project…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment related to a pipeline project during House floor debate.
Share
More from Karen Thurman
And that was one of those issues that in fact raised the level of it, and it causes a lot of problems for some people. But on this generic thing, I think there is something else that needs to be remembered. This is not just about seniors…
Mr. Chairman, before we go on to this next debate, I do want to say, and I really hope that some of my friends on the other side will look at their rollcall vote 103 in April of 1999, to stand up here in one day with this President to talk…
we keep hearing this 30 percent. Actually, there has been a letter dated by the CBO on July 26 that says that they are confused, that there has been some confusion about the meaning of the 30 percent cost management factor that CBO applied…
I would say to our chairman that I think one of the issues here is that we are really trying to get an opportunity to debate this issue, and not under the consent calendar, and to move it along in a different manner. I would also bring in…





