It was to also recognize that Social Security was never supposed to be what people would have to live off of. So if we could find these U.S.A. accounts or whatever magic name we wanted to call them, the fact of the matter was that they would be there for the purposes of folks who do not make but a small amount of money, and they would invest into this on their own to be matched. It gave them incentives. Mr. Speaker, guess what we have found. When people save, it is good for everybody in America. It is part of the economy. Savings is a part of what we rely on. So there was a plan with an outcome that was good for everyone and with no false hopes.
Karen Thurman: “It was to also recognize that Social Security was never supposed to be what people would have to live off of. So if we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of savings and Social Security in the economy.
Share
More from Karen Thurman
The only thing I would say then is maybe us being here tonight and talking about this issue, maybe it will give some pause; and maybe we will have the opportunity to have that debate.
We keep hearing this 30 percent. Actually, there has been a letter dated by the CBO on July 26 that says that they are confused, that there has been some confusion about the meaning of the 30 percent cost management factor that CBO applied…
I want to point out something here that continues to be talked about in the low-income seniors being given total prescription drugs. The problem is in the bill that we are talking about, it does not waive the asset test that beneficiaries…
And we could say the gentlewoman from Nevada (Ms. Berkley) has given us a wonderful opportunity to understand what happened in Nevada. And it would seem to me that it would be something this Congress ought to be looking at where the…





