today begins dramatic change in how Government operates. For the first time in decades, we will start talking straight with the American people about the Federal budget. Every American family who must meet a budget understands that an increase in spending means you spent more money than last year. Not so here in Washington. Back in 1974 the Congress decided to adopt baseline budgeting--an arcane concept that allowed Government to grow on auto-pilot for two decades. Here in Washington an increase in Federal spending is considered a cut in spending unless it exceeds the estimated increase in cost. That's like the perennially overweight man who figures he'll gain 30 pounds this year--and when it turns out he only gained 10 he announces he's lost 20 pounds. But today, Mr. Speaker, all that deception stops. From now on, an increase in spending will be called an increase in spending. If we spend $1.4 trillion this year and plan to spend $1.5 trillion next year, we'll call that exactly what is--a $100-billion increase in spending. Sounds simple, but here in Washington it is revolutionary.
Jeff Miller: “today begins dramatic change in how Government operates. For the first time in decades, we will start talking straight…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes in how the government communicates about the Federal budget.
Share
More from Jeff Miller
We must work together to fix the unacceptable systemic problems in accessing VA healthcare and that the VA is taking action to accelerate, access to care reaching out to veterans.
Well, I would think the thing the president should have done today was to come out and say, I am going to sign an executive order that would allow all veterans who were backlogged in the system, who tried to get appointments, the ability…
Well, I'm not surprised. I had actually heard information that corroborated what the Arizona Republic has already put out. I, in fact, have given a request for a preservation order to the department. And unfortunately, it took them eight…
I can tell you this, after what I heard today I am less convinced that the appropriate leadership is in place at the Department of Veterans Affairs.





