in an article in the Hartford Current dated September 27 of this year, the chair of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct reflected on the committee's inquiry into the complaint against Speaker Newt Gingrich. I quote, ``The letter of the law is not compelling to me,'' she said, ``I will work with our rules. Our rules have a certain degree of flexibility. My goal is to have a process that the committee members feel good about.'' Mr. Speaker, the work of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is not about Members feeling good about themselves. If both the spirit and the letter of the law are not compelling and relevant to each and every inquiry undertaken by this important committee, then we have lost sight of the purposes of its function.
Harry Johnston: “in an article in the Hartford Current dated September 27 of this year, the chair of the Committee on Standards of…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct's inquiry into Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Share
More from Harry Johnston
I address this bill on two levels: No. 1, my interest in Africa; and, No. 2, just general foreign policy. First, the bill cuts back the development funds for Africa. There is $800 million for 600 million people, and now that is gone. Next…
I am concerned that the definition of environmental technology might be interpreted too broadly, specifically, that the definition might be used to encompass technologies developed by the Department of Energy. What is the Senator's…
I have several concerns with the bill as reported. H.R. 3870 would establish the definition of environmental technology so broadly that energy technologies such as those involving nuclear power, fusion, solar, or energy efficiency could be…
In 1995, 46,000 women will die from breast cancer, and another 182,000 will be diagnosed with this disease. The incidence of breast cancer has increased by 2 percent every year since 1980. Today I am introducing legislation to help reverse…





