In an article in the Hartford Current dated September 27 of this year, the chair of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct reflected on the committee's inquiry into the complaint against Speaker Newt Gingrich. I quote, ``The letter of the law is not compelling to me,'' she said, ``I will work with our rules. Our rules have a certain degree of flexibility. My goal is to have a process that the committee members feel good about.'' Mr. Speaker, the work of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is not about Members feeling good about themselves. If both the spirit and the letter of the law are not compelling and relevant to each and every inquiry undertaken by this important committee, then we have lost sight of the purposes of its function.
Harry Johnston: “In an article in the Hartford Current dated September 27 of this year, the chair of the Committee on Standards of…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct's inquiry into Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Share
More from Harry Johnston
I was inquiring and investigating the process of the committee itself, and not into the specific inquiry of the Speaker. I think if the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Ehlers] listened closely, the gentleman would see the distinction of his…
The gentleman's bill has not eliminated what is in progress right now; but has eliminated any future allocations to the housing project.
I am concerned that the definition of environmental technology might be interpreted too broadly, specifically, that the definition might be used to encompass technologies developed by the Department of Energy. What is the Senator's…
It is not my intention in offering the amendment to imply any war power authorization for United States military force to act in Bosnia. This subsection of the amendment would only have the Congress advise the President that he should…





