I think this is a tremendously important amendment. Let us really look at the record of the special prosecutors and how they have evolved over the years. It is a very tough standard that we must put on any administration that a special prosecutor with all these powers can be appointed, and this person is appointed to investigate a specific person, and this person is semi-independent from the Department of Justice. I think that what we have to do is say that if we are going to put this as a standard on the administration, then we certainly should apply it ourselves. It can be said that here we go again, exempting ourselves from these laws, and that is exactly what we are doing. By boiling this thing down and saying it is permissive, it just simply yanks the heart out of the whole thing. This is a high standard that we place upon the administration. We should place this same standard upon ourselves and this body. I do not view this as a partisan move at all.
E. Clay Shaw, Jr.: “I think this is a tremendously important amendment. Let us really look at the record of the special prosecutors and how…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the importance of applying the same standards to Congress as those imposed on administrations regarding special prosecutors.
Share
More from E. Clay Shaw, Jr.
Ms. Norton, I know you hear me, but you are not listening. Training is in the Republican bill.
Because it was not paid for. It was a budget buster, and this is something that I feel is very irresponsible. We are not helping--we are not helping even the kids on welfare----
If she cannot find a job, we will get one for her. We need more child care, we need cleaning up at the housing projects, we need these things. All we require is that after that 2 years she is going to work for these benefits.
When you talk about welfare, you have to talk about food stamps, you have to talk about child nutrition programs, you have to talk about housing, you have to talk about all of the things that come into this.





