Because it was not paid for. It was a budget buster, and this is something that I feel is very irresponsible. We are not helping--we are not helping even the kids on welfare----
E. Clay Shaw, Jr.: “Because it was not paid for. It was a budget buster, and this is something that I feel is very irresponsible. We are not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a budget proposal.
Share
More from E. Clay Shaw, Jr.
The bill helps preserve family-owned businesses by counting all family members as one shareholder for purposes of S corporation eligibility.
And what have you, the Democrats, done to take the lead in the House on welfare reform? I very much want to know that because I am on the committee that has jurisdiction.
Ms. Norton, I would like to explore what I see is a possible division in the ranks on your side to see if I can put a spotlight on it to try to set up the stage as to where we are going to be when this debate finally comes to the floor of…
I believe the House is making a serious mistake today in considering a matter as important as reform of the Federal Flood Insurance Program on the Suspension Calendar. I object to the use of this expedited process, and I urge Members to…





