If it is not, you supply them. But you take the basic proposition that you will support the enforcement that in 2 years you have got to work at something, if you cannot find a job we will find one for you, and if we can find one for you, then you know at that point you have got to take it or we will find it for you. The question I have as a follow-up because I am seeing a little hesitation on your side, what does this have to pay? And if we supply such a job, a public service job, the one Mr. Franks talked about and the one Ms. Molinari talked about, like taking graffiti off the wall in the housing project, helping there, helping with daycare?
E. Clay Shaw, Jr.: “If it is not, you supply them. But you take the basic proposition that you will support the enforcement that in 2 years…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing job creation and public service jobs during a debate.
Share
More from E. Clay Shaw, Jr.
This bill would remove this obsolete prohibition and also provide that S corporations can attract needed financing through convertible debt.
Let me share this with the gentlewoman then: We sent our welfare bill, which has the training that you want, has the job search that you want, supplies a job at the end of the time, which you want even though we may disagree on how much…
Well, I think there has to be a safety net, and there must be--and I think that is what we are supporting on our side. One of the problems, and the problem that we really have not--not approached here as a Congress is the question of male…
Even after the relief provided in 1996, S corporations face substantial obstacles and limitations not imposed on other forms of entities.





