Gabby had been following the negotiations and wanted to be able to be in the chamber to cast her vote, if it was pivotal, she wanted to make sure that she could help stave country from default.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Public Record
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Florida's 23rd congressional district since 2005. A member of the Democratic Party, she has held various leadership roles, including serving as the chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2011 to 2016. Throughout her tenure, Wasserman Schultz has focused on issues such as healthcare, education, and women's rights, advocating for policies that aim to improve the lives of her constituents. She has been an outspoken advocate for gun control and has worked on legislation addressing the needs of veterans and military families.
Thank you. President Obama and House and Senate Democrats have said we are willing to support cuts even to programs we would normally fight to preserve. Republicans in response have doubled down in a Groundhog Day move that has pushed…
Being unemployed, Mr. Romney, is not a joke, not to my constituents in Florida or to millions of Americans across the country.
We are literally jeopardizing children's lives by not having adequate access to this information.
I have a very strong record on privacy going all the way back to Terry Schiavo.
Your autocomplete feature continues to suggest that people visit websites with pirated content, that Google enables and facilitates theft.
The word 'knock-off' doesn't really conjure up anything other than trying to steal something that is someone else's intellectual property.
As our economy continues to recover, we really must take every action that we can to create jobs and meaningfully address intellectual property theft.
I really want to start off by thanking you for holding this hearing today and for officially opening this investigation into rogue websites here in the House.
Just an extension of what Mr. Rokita referred to, would you say that it is not responsible for us to hold the lifting of the debt ceiling hostage...
Individuals who have to go to the emergency room to get their health care which is part of that $43 billion is not inactivity.
The $62 billion in savings to which I just referred: Is that separate and distinct from the $125 billion in savings included in the budget related to program integrity?
I think that when casting aspersions about the lack of a plan, they should look inward first.
It should have been a priority to issue that report annually since 2008 regardless of whether the appropriations were made.
There is a way to keep these individuals who are very, very likely to re-offend confined.
I am quite proud, along with my colleague, Ms. Adams, that our home State is fully compliant.
Isn't it likely that the combination of all of those things would result in the recovery slowing as opposed to quickening?
So potentially if we cut too much too quick and we have the expiration of the Recovery Act funds, with the State and local governments facing significant deficits to start with, couldn't we endanger the recovery?
So that fact, coupled with draconian cuts proposed, for example, in Chairman Ryan's plan, which is like an anti-Recovery Act, would you give us a sense whether you think large spending cuts like that right away would be an additional drain…
Just by way of comparison, would you say that unemployment compensation, a payroll tax holiday, other kinds of policies that put money directly into the hands of lower-income individuals, would provide more bang for the buck for the…
I think he is exactly wrong in terms of both his explanation related to the Recovery Act and its impact as well as what are the policies that provide us with the biggest bang for our buck.





