Debbie Wasserman Schultz

I am concerned about further slippage. And, you know, I am not willing to just sign off on, you know, more funds being released for this project until there is a better handle on the timeline.

The President and Congressional Democrats are simply waiting for the GOP join us at the negotiating table so that we can hammer out a compromise that takes that balanced approach.

When you are an appropriator, you understand that.

It is the ultimate in being pennywise and pound foolish to cut GAO.

I think it is important to just raise what the purpose of the Government Accountability Office is.

Congress needs us now more than ever.

I believe we provide a good return on the investment.

As Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz pointed out, our requests have tapered off a bit because people understand the situation.

Mr. Dodaro, is it fair to say that if the sequester kicks in, that we will have less accountability and more potential waste of taxpayer dollars?

So wouldn't you have sequester-related requests that would add to your workload?

I don't believe that this staffing level is commensurate with the challenges facing our Federal Government right now.

More cuts to GAO are the embodiment of the phrase 'pennywise and pound foolish.'

Mitt Romney is simply saying one thing but not insisting that his party's policies, as reflected in their platform, reflect his views.

There is no way that a presidential candidate, a party's nominee, can separate themselves from that party's platform.

Mitt Romney has embraced previous Republican Party platforms and embrace that language, and said he'd be delighted to support a constitutional amendment banning all abortion.

His campaign just directed the Republican Party platform to include the most restrictive constitutional amendment that would say to women that you would have no opportunity to make your own reproductive choices under any circumstances even…

I think that women need to know the dramatic difference between President Obama's position on a woman's right to her own reproductive choices as well as the Democratic Party's position and Mitt Romney and the Republican Party.

But guess what? The 'Los Angeles Times' reported yesterday that the platform was, and I quote, 'written at the direction of Romney's campaign'.

And now we have a Republican Party platform that was designed by Mitt Romney.

Mitt Romney is disingenuous when it comes to his position on a woman's right to make her own reproductive choices, and he's extreme and has embraced an extreme position.

Women need to know the difference between the two parties and the two presidential candidates on a woman's right to make her own reproductive choices and that Mitt Romney can say that he's for an exception for rape or incest. His party…

Mitt Romney has fully embraced a policy... that includes a constitutional amendment banning all forms of abortion, including with no exception for rape or incest.

The bottom line is that Romney's campaign just directed the Republican Party platform to include the most restrictive constitutional amendment that would say to women that you would have no opportunity to make your own reproductive choices…

I think women need to know the dramatic difference between President Obama's position on a woman's right to make her own reproductive choices, as well as the Democratic Party position, and Mitt Romney and the Republican Party.

Actually, if Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan became president and vice president of the United States, they'd be able to end the Medicare guarantee, shred the health care safety net that Medicare has provided for more than 50 years, and turn…