Debbie Wasserman Schultz

I rise as the designee of the gentlewoman from Connecticut, and I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes.

This amendment is noncontroversial, and I am not opposed to it. It encourages the Navy and Marine Corps to effectively use its demolition funding. I yield back the balance of my time.

I claim the time in opposition to the amendment, although I am not opposed to it. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentlewoman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.

I claim the time in opposition to the gentlewoman's amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes.

This amendment is noncontroversial. I do not oppose it. It supports community-based outpatient clinics and mobile medical units. I yield back the balance of my time.

I claim the time in opposition, although I am not opposed to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentlewoman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.

As I said, I rise in opposition to this amendment, particularly because CBO says that the cost of actually implementing this would be astronomical, and the majority is already cutting $6 billion out of this bill, so I don't understand how…

I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Georgia will be postponed. Amendment No. 17 Offered by Ms. Hageman The Acting CHAIR. It is…

May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Florida has 3 minutes remaining.

I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Arizona will be postponed. Amendment No. 16 Offered by Ms. Greene of Georgia The Acting…

I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois will be postponed. Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mr. Burchett The Acting CHAIR. It is…

I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR (Ms. Malliotakis). The gentlewoman from Florida is recognized for 5 minutes.

This isn't a two-tiered system of justice. These are just two men who acted very differently, one compliant, one criminally obstructive.

Unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden didn't prevent anyone from going through any boxes or materials to search for classified documents, correct?

Does this sound like someone who follows and respects the law? I certainly don't think so.

My Republican colleagues claimed a two-tiered system of justice exists because Trump was indicted for his handling of classified documents and exposing our Nation's most guarded secrets, while Republican Special Counsel Robert Hur found…

I think it is important to point out that the most clear evidence of why we are here on a Wednesday... is to witness tamper.

One is an upstanding American civil servant who fully cooperated with an investigation, and the other is a man who took multiple criminal actions to cover up his intentional theft of sensitive public and national security documents.

What we're trying to do is introduce into the record the email that ensures that we have an opportunity to--

He's covering it up which has been repeatedly obvious during this hearing because for the first time in my 20-year career in Congress, I have never seen the majority not allow introduction by unanimous consent of information into the…

It's breathtaking that now we're suggesting that we arrest people who are trying to make sure that they can save lives and prevent them from dying of a novel virus that killed millions of people.

I think it's a shame that this has happened, and I hope we criminalize it because you should not be able to violate the First Amendment rights of American citizens and not have consequences for it.

So, in the future if we can ensure that when Members yield that they remain in the room. That would be helpful.

The bottom line here is this is a Hail Mary of a hearing designed to improperly influence the Supreme Court.

To wage an inappropriate court influence scheme under the cover of oversight and impugn men who did their job and did it well is not just improper, it's actual weaponization of the Federal Government.