I rise today in strong opposition to H.R. 2108, the Black Lung Benefits Restoration Act. This bill represents yet another expansion of entitlements without a single thought dedicated to paying for the new spending. The changes made by this legislation, far from enhancing the availability of benefits under the Black Lung Program, will only serve to undermine the long-run financial viability of the entire program. To those in this Congress who have fought to add fiscal responsibility to the Federal budget process, the history of the Black Lung Program in an all-too-familiar tale. A last minute add-on to another piece of legislation in 1969, the costs of this small, temporary entitlement ballooned far beyond original estimates. Each successive change expanded eligibility and benefits under the program, and by the late seventies, the Black Lung Program had become a permanent entitlement and a significant burden on U.S. taxpayers. It is easy to dole out new benefits to laudable causes, but few Members ever talk about the costs and tradeoffs each program expansion necessitates. Every new Federal dollar spent must be taken from somewhere else. All too often it comes from future generations of American taxpayers. Such careless compassion turns out not to be very compassionate at all, because it ignores the real costs associated with any budget decision.
Dan Miller: “I rise today in strong opposition to H.R. 2108, the Black Lung Benefits Restoration Act. This bill represents yet…”
On the recordMay 19, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 2108, the Black Lung Benefits Restoration Act, during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Dan Miller
May 18, 1999
It devastates the environment, particularly the fragile Everglades in my home State of Florida.
May 18, 1999
The Sugar Program Reform Act will do what the 1996 farm bill failed to accomplish.
Mar 21, 1994
Mr. Chairman, as we continue debate on H.R. 6, Mr. Boehner and I have focused on trying to bring some semblance of fiscal sanity to this Chamber, and to maintain some minimum level of autonomy for State and local officials to make the…
May 18, 1999
The sugar program is the 'sugar daddy' of corporate welfare. Why? Because most of the benefits of this program go to huge corporate sugar producers, not the typical family farmer.





