Political Quotes

Dan Miller: Mr. Chairman, as we continue debate on H.R. 6, Mr. Boehner and I have focused on trying to bring some semblance of…

On the recordMarch 21, 1994
Mr. Chairman, as we continue debate on H.R. 6, Mr. Boehner and I have focused on trying to bring some semblance of fiscal sanity to this Chamber, and to maintain some minimum level of autonomy for State and local officials to make the education decisions best suited for their unique circumstances. The technical assistance for funding equalization is another small, new spending program totaling $8 million for fiscal year 1995, intended to promote funding equalization on the State level. This spending is unnecessary. Not one cent of this $8 million will ever reach a student. It will only go to feed the education bureaucracy. This program is based on the questionable assumption that equality of resources is somehow the key to solving our education problems in America. If pouring more money into education funding was the key to solving all our problems, we would not be debating this issue today. Unlike some Members of this body, I do not believe that Federal spending, per se, is the magical solution to improved education. As a nation, we are already spending more on the education of our children than our competitors with too few results to show for it. We simply cannot afford to keep spending money we don't have.
Said by
Dan Miller
Florida

Editor's note · Context

Debating amendments to cut spending in the H.R. 6 education bill.

Share

More from Dan Miller

May 12, 1994

I rise today in opposition to the Head Start Amendments Act of 1994. As a member of both the Education and Labor Committee and the Subcommittee on Human Resources, I do so with some regret, because I strongly support the concept of Head…

govinfo.gov
Mar 17, 1994

I rise in strong support of the Barton tax limitation-balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. I was elected on a promise to fight for real change. But here we are today, very little having changed. I have spent the last 15 months…

govinfo.gov
May 18, 1999

The sugar program is the 'sugar daddy' of corporate welfare. Why? Because most of the benefits of this program go to huge corporate sugar producers, not the typical family farmer.

congress.gov
May 18, 1999

Today myself, Representative George Miller and more than 40 of our colleagues are introducing the Sugar Program Reform Act, a bill to phase out the sugar program by the end of 2002.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation