we have used that argument, and I have heard it so many times. I understand why the gentlewoman is using it on her side. This is the crux of the question, shall we allow the distribution of this material in our schools or not? The gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock] believes that we should not, and obviously, the literature that he has cited over here, which is obscene, I think the gentlewoman would agree, the other literature he mentioned which is on the table, that many of us can hardly open, is obscene. Under the gentlewoman's amendment, as I understand it, she is saying that literature could not be distributed?
Cliff Stearns: “we have used that argument, and I have heard it so many times. I understand why the gentlewoman is using it on her side.…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the distribution of certain literature in schools.
Share
More from Cliff Stearns
Thank you, Connie, very much for that report, and thank you also for the continued leadership that you have provided for the former Members of Congress. Your counsel is always appreciated and is invaluable. I now will lead to another…
We've had a very good session of the 112th Congress, and we got through it last night. I think all of us, regardless of how we voted, feel a certain relief that we can move on in this country and start to tackle the huge deficit we have…
Barbara, thank you very much. And thank you, Members, for your confidence. I think in light of the hour here, we will go right directly to honoring our past president and our vice president. Pete, if you will give me the plaques, I would…
There are three components to her amendment. The first one is so surprising that she would make this claim that the title XVII program created 60,000 new jobs. Of course, if you go to the Department of Energy's own Web site and you add up…





