Then the other question is, in Generation IV, the nuclear energy system by which you increased it $80 million, it seems to me, and you might want to answer this question, here you have a program that is a fourth generation of nuclear research. We don't even have the results from the second and third generation nuclear research, yet you're increasing a huge amount of money for something well into the future when you have a system, the 2010 energy system, which could use this money today and would go towards improving global warming and put less demand on all these nuclear energy companies because they certainly can't meet the demand in the next 2 years without burning coal and gas. So I ask the gentleman, why would he want to increase something that's a fourth generation when the second and third generation have not even been successful in providing anything for us?
Cliff Stearns: “Then the other question is, in Generation IV, the nuclear energy system by which you increased it $80 million, it seems…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning funding for Generation IV nuclear energy research without results from earlier generations.
Share
More from Cliff Stearns
thank you, Martin. I think, as you pointed out, we were waiting for both the majority leader, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, and the minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, between 8:45 and 9:00, and they might have had different schedules/commitments…
Mr. Cadden, 32 people have died, 400 people are infected, and scores of others who were injected with medicine your company compounded are waiting, holding their breath to see if they will get sick from the products you have made.
The Chair announces that 27 former Members of Congress have responded to their names.
As pointed out by Chairman Upton, the investigation was methodical; it was systematic; it was thorough; and it was over an 18- month period. It took us almost 8 months after we issued a subpoena in November to try to even get the…





