In conclusion, let me just say I think we have a fundamental difference between what the gentlewoman is trying to do and what the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock] is trying to do. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Hancock amendment to prevent parents from being forced to subsidize the teaching of values that run directly counter to those they strive to teach their children, and against the Unsoeld amendment, which would attempt to distort the intentions of what the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock] is trying to do. He is simply trying to say, ``Let us not subsidize the distribution of material,'' not only like what I have in my hand, but obviously some of the material over there which is really destructive.
Cliff Stearns: “In conclusion, let me just say I think we have a fundamental difference between what the gentlewoman is trying to do and…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating amendments related to educational values and parental rights.
Share
More from Cliff Stearns
In 2006 when the original SAFE WEB Act was signed into law, I was Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection. I believed then, as I believe now, that this bill provided needed…
Thank you, Connie, very much for that report, and thank you also for the continued leadership that you have provided for the former Members of Congress. Your counsel is always appreciated and is invaluable. I now will lead to another…
We thank the distinguished minority leader. And with that, let me close by saying, the Chair again, wishes to thank the former Members of the House and Senate for all of your presence today. And before terminating these proceedings, the…
As pointed out by Chairman Upton, the investigation was methodical; it was systematic; it was thorough; and it was over an 18- month period. It took us almost 8 months after we issued a subpoena in November to try to even get the…





