So, to emphasize what the gentleman is saying here, Madam Chairman, the Pyler versus Doe Supreme Court decision said States are not mandated if the Federal Government sets a policy, and in this amendment, the one that the gentleman had yesterday on striking the provisions in dealing with bilingual education and in many of his amendments, they have been shown to be setting the policy by the Federal Government in the gentleman's amendment. So that precludes the idea that there is any Federal mandates, so I think my colleagues should realize this whole argument on the basis of this is that all Federal mandates on the States is erroneous if we in Congress set the policy. Is that not true?
Cliff Stearns: “So, to emphasize what the gentleman is saying here, Madam Chairman, the Pyler versus Doe Supreme Court decision said…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Pyler v. Doe decision on federal mandates and state policy.
Share
More from Cliff Stearns
Barbara, thank you very much. And thank you, Members, for your confidence. I think in light of the hour here, we will go right directly to honoring our past president and our vice president. Pete, if you will give me the plaques, I would…
Next, we will elect our Executive Committee. I automatically join the Executive Committee in my capacity as past president. The secretary and treasurer are each elected to a 1-year term, with eligibility for another 1-year term. The…
Barbara, if you will come up. Barbara, your plaque is inscribed: ``We thank Congresswoman Barbara Kennelly of Connecticut for her leadership and guidance for the past 2 years as president of the U.S. Association of Former Members of…
Mr. Frost and Mr. Boustany have been elected president and vice president of FMC. Congratulations to you both. Martin, at the risk of having the Speaker's chair be vacant for a minute, I would like for you to join us here at the rostrum to…





