Yesterday was a sad day in our Nation's history. In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court managed to seriously undermine our tradition of democratic self-governance, and, at the same time, to deliver a harsh slap-in-the-face to all Americans who seek to preserve traditional moral standards regarding homosexuality. I hope and expect that American citizens share my sense of outrage at the Court's action. I'm referring to the Court's decision in the case of Romer versus Evans. The case involves an amendment to the Colorado State Constitution adopted in 1992 by the citizens of that State. The amendment, known as amendment 2, would have prevented the State or any of its political subdivisions from enacting, adopting, or enforcing any law granting homosexuals protected status or other preferential treatment. Amendment 2 was adopted in response to the actions of several Colorado cities that had adopted so-called gay rights ordinances, which had added homosexuals to the list of protected persons under local antidiscrimination laws. By a 6-to-3 vote, the court yesterday ruled that amendment 2 violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Charles T. Canady: “Yesterday was a sad day in our Nation's history. In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court managed to seriously…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Supreme Court's decision in Romer v. Evans regarding Colorado's amendment 2 on homosexual rights.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
The statement in the letter is absolutely accurate. The terminology that happens to be applied to the procedure is not what is at issue. It is a matter of fact, however, that the procedure which exists, which is used, which would come…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4640, the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act, was introduced by the gentleman from Florida (Mr. McCollum) together with the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) the ranking minority member, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr…
the important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…
no one is excluded from this protections of the amendment any more than people or ideas are excluded by the words ``in God we trust'' here on the wall of this Chamber.





