We are going to do that, because we grant them the right to compensation for the diminution in the fair market value of their property. What I am telling you is $5,000 in that case would be a sham. That is not the fair market value.
Charles T. Canady: “We are going to do that, because we grant them the right to compensation for the diminution in the fair market value of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing property compensation rights during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a bill designed to protect the free exercise of religion from unnecessary governmental interference. The legislation uses the recognized constitutional authority of the Congress…
Is it not true that the bill the gentleman has sponsored would give the abortionist unfettered discretion to determine when an abortion would be performed during the third trimester or post viability? Because the gentleman has an exception…
It is true that the committee rejected an article of impeachment based on tax fraud against President Nixon, but it is equally clear that the overwhelming majority of the members of the committee who expressed an opinion on that subject…
what is required is that there be a meaningful application and that these steps be gone through as they are permitted under the local process.





