I can assure the gentleman that the intent of the statute is not to provide compensation to water users in such circumstances. Where a user is guaranteed an allotment of water, but that allotment is reduced in a way that is recognized and anticipated by the user's contract with the Government, the reduction would not be a limitation under this bill requiring compensation.
Charles T. Canady: “I can assure the gentleman that the intent of the statute is not to provide compensation to water users in such…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent of a statute related to water user compensation.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
America's farming community plays a vital role in the prosperity of the nation.
The statement in the letter is absolutely accurate. The terminology that happens to be applied to the procedure is not what is at issue. It is a matter of fact, however, that the procedure which exists, which is used, which would come…
Under the laws of all the States, those individuals that the gentlewoman has specified would be enabled to go with the young woman to a judge for the judicial bypass. That is available under all the laws as required by the Supreme Court.
I do not support the gun laws of New York. I think a lot of New Yorkers are moving to Florida so maybe that has something to do with the better legal climate in Florida.





