Is it possible that there are some other things that could be held back, pushed into the future, to address a lower request for 2012?

You've done an outstanding job in leveraging nonappropriated funds over the last several years.

One thing that I've found not just in this position, but also as Governor is that the more I knew about a program, the harder it was to cut.

Well, clearly, cutting mid-term has ramifications that could be draconian.

We want more information, but we want to pay less for it.

But condition alone will only be part of it because mission requirements would be equally or, in many cases, more important?

Obviously, we're in this together. We want to find a way to make it work for, as Dr. Billington says, the United States of America.

I think that it's important to point out that every agency of Government is going to be faced with the problem of how to continue to operate during the next 6 months.

We're our own worst enemy in that regard.

So, you have given me a lot of information to make it even harder to think about cutting.

As we all are aware of the fiscal constrains, if additional funding isn't provided and if you're funded at the fiscal year 2010 enacted level, what would it take within your budget to absorb that kind of a budget cut?

Dr. Billington, you mentioned that if you have subscriptions and you stop them for 1 year, it's not as though you lost 12 volumes, or, 12 issues, but it's an even bigger impact than that.