I am a believer that at some point you should just bring in the FBI and the Department of Justice and treat a rape like a rape and throw people in prison.

It seems to me that from your office you ought to suggest that some heads ought to roll so that people know that we mean business when we set a contract and set some deadlines.

I would hope that as we get our space program cranked up again... that might bring a lot more young people into these fields of high technology.

Do you see any potential change of the sequester in the present fiscal year until September the 30th?

Financial incentives of both benefits and penalties have worked in the past.

Maybe that suggests that we ought to rethink how we contract.

I would just point out for your folks sitting behind you that the sales tax deduction expires at the end of this year.

Under sequestration, would this move go forward?

But, you know, from revenue versus cuts, you have just one to three, one part revenue to three parts of cuts.

I am at a loss to understand why the Administration is proposing to cut STEM funds in half and to reorganize it through the Department of Education, National Science Foundation, and the Smithsonian.

No doubt you are all the more frustrated in realizing that so many of the veterans retire, and where do they come? They come to my State of Florida.

Does this suggest incompetence on the part of the contractor?