Today, we are at 405 parts per million.

We feel that the study should be fully funded by Congressional appropriators.

I have seen it in Washington. I have seen it here in the state of Florida Government.

A few years ago, I visited the NOAA observatory on top of Mauna Loa, and it was a bittersweet moment.

So given the modeling scenarios that you have seen, do you think those losses that are primarily being borne by the individuals, since they were not insured losses, will rise in the future, given what we are seeing?

There were four witnesses by the majority, and all of them were denying that the climate was changed.

And that is so true in Florida not only for commercial fishermen but for recreational fishermen as well.

this fits hand-in-glove with our Everglades restoration efforts, moving that water south and increasingly getting it cleansed

We have to put a red line in the sand in stopping any attempt to remove the collection of data.

I cannot imagine planning for the future conditions of the community and making informed policy planning investment decisions without recognizing the reality of what the driving factors are.

moving those wells further west ultimately ends up with the customer paying more because of the added expense.