I think the timing is poor, and I agree and associate myself with the remarks of the previous speaker with reference to the preserving of the process. That said, the question is, why would we act unilaterally in declaring war with Yugoslavia? Presently, we are not at war with Yugoslavia; we are engaged in an international mission to bring about peace in Yugoslavia. A unilateral declaration of war would signal that the United States was intensifying the war, while others were fighting for more limited objectives. OSCE and NATO this past week confirmed as our partners the objectives that we have set forth. Why, then, would we destroy our credibility with NATO and destroy NATO's credibility? I suggest that we defeat this declaration.
Alcee Hastings: “I think the timing is poor, and I agree and associate myself with the remarks of the previous speaker with reference to…”
On the recordApril 28, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a unilateral declaration of war with Yugoslavia.
Share
More from Alcee Hastings
Dec 16, 2019
Do you recognize that such a visit would send a strong message to Russia... that the United States supported Ukraine and was ready to defend it against Russian aggression?
Dec 16, 2019
Can anybody in here, particularly those of us on the Rules Committee, name any other President in the history of the United States that has asked a foreign government or its leaders to investigate an American citizen for political purposes?
Dec 16, 2019
How many of my friends here on this dais think it is okay for an American President to solicit foreign interference in our elections?





