How do you arrive at that objectively? I heard you say a moment ago it was based on what the jury ultimately decides as to whether or not there was ultimate merit. Do you not contemplate excellent litigants being on the defense side or plaintiff's side being more persuasive or jurors that are quirky or judges who are stupid, or do you not contemplate any of those things?
Questioning the objectivity of jury decisions in a legal context.
Share
More from Alcee Hastings
State-sponsored fraud, coercion, and obfuscation make it impossible to know the true will of the Russian people.
Trump withheld his taxpayer money to help our ally fight a hot war against Russia so he, President Trump, could obtain a personal political benefit.
We find ourselves here today discussing two Articles of Impeachment against President Donald John Trump because of his disregard of and disrespect for the United States Constitution.
I appreciate your efforts to stop the administration's attempt to redirect USACE funds toward a wasteful and ineffective border wall.
Other voices in this conversation
