How do you arrive at that objectively? I heard you say a moment ago it was based on what the jury ultimately decides as to whether or not there was ultimate merit. Do you not contemplate excellent litigants being on the defense side or plaintiff's side being more persuasive or jurors that are quirky or judges who are stupid, or do you not contemplate any of those things?
Questioning the objectivity of jury decisions in a legal context.
Share
More from Alcee Hastings
I do think that its disadvantages outweigh its advantages, and that it ultimately will not work with a budget as complex and as fraught with partisanship as ours.
I appreciate your efforts to stop the administration's attempt to redirect USACE funds toward a wasteful and ineffective border wall.
Chairman Alcee Hastings and I are preparing to introduce bipartisan legislation in the House and Senate to tackle the abuse of INTERPOL by autocrats.
Other voices in this conversation
