Three-quarters of the amendments that were submitted on time pursuant to the chairman's correct direction to the body are not a part of the debate here. The Sensenbrenner amendment, which is rather lengthy, came late to the committee. It is not being voted on up or down for the reason that it was made a self-executing part of the rule. Now, the gentleman can call that fair and balanced, but let me just say to the chairman that there is a new section 105, and many of the Members are hearing this for the first time. It eliminates Federal court review in many conventions against torture cases, and it eliminates the power of the Federal appeals court judges to stay the removal of asylum seekers. I do not think any irony is lost on the chairman about the Ninth Circuit's ruling.
Alcee Hastings: “Three-quarters of the amendments that were submitted on time pursuant to the chairman's correct direction to the body…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the exclusion of amendments and implications of new legislation regarding torture and asylum seekers.
Share
More from Alcee Hastings
How many of my friends here on this dais think it is okay for an American President to solicit foreign interference in our elections?
Let me urge President Trump to look around the world if he wants to talk about corruption...
We find ourselves here today discussing two Articles of Impeachment against President Donald John Trump because of his disregard of and disrespect for the United States Constitution.
Can anybody in here, particularly those of us on the Rules Committee, name any other President in the history of the United States that has asked a foreign government or its leaders to investigate an American citizen for political purposes?





