On the recordMay 10, 2016
But here's my point. You're not just doing this for the sake of advancing scientific knowledge; you're doing this so that we can actually sequester carbon on a large scale and reduce pollution, correct?
Source
congress.govAlan Grayson: “But here's my point. You're not just doing this for the sake of advancing scientific knowledge; you're doing this so…”
Editor's note · Context
Grayson questions the purpose of scientific advancements in carbon sequestration.
Share
More from Alan Grayson
Jul 6, 2016
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Strike section 613. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 794, the gentleman from Florida (Mr…
Jun 15, 2016
The bill, as written, indicates that the joint resolution itself is enough to rescind the President's action when, in fact, in order to make it proper, under the Presentment Clause, you would need a joint resolution and the President's…
Jul 13, 2016
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 73, line 3, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced by $468,000)(increased by $468,000)''. The…
Jul 13, 2016
This amendment is nearly identical to an amendment that passed by voice vote last year. I hope we will agree on its passage again this year.
Other voices in this conversation
