On the recordMay 10, 2016
But here's my point. You're not just doing this for the sake of advancing scientific knowledge; you're doing this so that we can actually sequester carbon on a large scale and reduce pollution, correct?
Source
congress.govAlan Grayson: “But here's my point. You're not just doing this for the sake of advancing scientific knowledge; you're doing this so…”
Editor's note · Context
Grayson questions the purpose of scientific advancements in carbon sequestration.
Share
More from Alan Grayson
May 18, 2016
This amendment is identical to other amendments that have been inserted by voice vote into every appropriations bill considered under an open rule during the 113th and 114th Congresses. My amendment expands the list of parties with whom…
Jun 10, 2016
This is an amendment that is identical to other amendments that have been inserted by voice vote into every appropriations bill considered under an open rule during the 113th and 114th Congresses. I extend my thanks to the Rules Committee…
Sep 7, 2016
Israel has felt for decades now that there is a noose around its neck regarding its energy supplies.
Jul 12, 2016
If we are not going to do anything about gun violence today, maybe we can do something about it tomorrow. I move to postpone this question to a date certain tomorrow. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 6(b) of rule 13, the…
Other voices in this conversation
