The bill, as written, indicates that the joint resolution itself is enough to rescind the President's action when, in fact, in order to make it proper, under the Presentment Clause, you would need a joint resolution and the President's signature, which is something that still does not provide for and, therefore, in my opinion, is in fact unconstitutional.
Grayson argues the joint resolution is unconstitutional without presidential signature.
Share
More from Alan Grayson
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida will be postponed. Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Kildee The Acting CHAIR. It is…
This amendment is identical to other amendments that have been inserted by voice vote into every appropriations bill considered under an open rule under the 113th and 114th Congresses and, in the last few weeks, under a structural rule. If…
I regard that as unconstitutional, under the INS v. Chadha decision from 1983.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 73, line 3, after the dollar amount, insert ``(reduced by $468,000)(increased by $468,000)''. The…
Other voices in this conversation
