I agree that relatives who are knowingly involved in a way that intentionally subverts the sanctions... should be punished to the extent the Constitution permits that.
Alan Grayson: “I agree that relatives who are knowingly involved in a way that intentionally subverts the sanctions... should be…”
Editor's note · Context
Grayson supports punishing relatives who undermine sanctions, emphasizing constitutional limits.
Share
More from Alan Grayson
I have an amendment at the desk, Grayson No. 1. The CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment. The Clerk read as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made available by…
the bill, as written, indicates that the joint resolution itself is enough to rescind the President's action when, in fact, in order to make it proper, under the Presentment Clause, you would need a joint resolution and the President's…
I appeal the ruling of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman's appeal may not be entertained. As reflected by the ruling of Speaker Crisp of September 20, 1893, an appeal of the Chair's refusal to entertain a motion on the…
Reclaiming my time, I appreciate my friend from New Jersey answering those questions. I would maintain that the simpler answer is that abortion is not murder; it is not the taking of human life. I yield 1 minute to my colleague from New …





