Do you think it is fair to say that if S. 907 was to pass, then for the bill to survive judicial review the courts would have to address the constitutionality of both fast-track authority and the President's existing rescission authority?
On the recordDecember 15, 2009
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Senator Carper questions the potential judicial review implications of the bill.
Share
More from Tom Carper
Dec 18, 2024
before we vote on WRDA this afternoon, I want to express my strong support for this bill, S. 4367, which my friend and colleague Shelley Moore Capito has graciously named in my honor. You could have knocked me over with a feather when we…
Jun 18, 2024
Yes. To assist Congress in understanding the extent and nature of exports to countries that have not ratified International Atomic Energy Agency safety and security protocols, the Commission must notify Congress if the NRC determines that…
Jul 25, 2024
To have vacancies that may be not just months, but in some cases years to that have been filled, that justice delayed is justice denied.





