Do you think it is fair to say that if S. 907 was to pass, then for the bill to survive judicial review the courts would have to address the constitutionality of both fast-track authority and the President's existing rescission authority?
Senator Carper questions the potential judicial review implications of the bill.
Share & report
More from Tom Carper
Madam President, I thank the Senator from West Virginia, my native State, for yielding to me. Out of the three Senators in the U.S. Senate from West Virginia, today we are all speaking on this proposal by Senator Cramer. I rise today in…
Mr. President, I rise today in support of Christopher T. Hanson's nomination to serve an additional 5-year term as a member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which he has chaired for several years. I want to begin by saying a few words…
We appreciate that. But provided nearly $50 billion with a B, $50 billion in financial relief for the Postal Service.
Mr. President, I further ask that the concurrent resolution be agreed to and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so…
Other voices in this conversation
