I want to boil this down into four questions that I have focused on as I have looked at this issue, looked at the treaty, looked at its ramifications. I want to start out by mentioning what I think the four maybe critical questions are that we should be asking ourselves. The first question is, does this treaty make us safer? I believe it does. I think absolutely it makes us safer. The second question is, can we afford not to ratify this treaty? I believe the answer is no; we cannot afford not to ratify this treaty.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of the New START treaty and its implications for national security.
Share
More from Tom Carper
Yes. The update to the mission statement does not compel the NRC to update its approach to determining how to set safety standards beyond what is required by current law.
on behalf of the majority leader, I ask the Chair to execute the order of December 12 with respect to the House message to accompany S. 4367. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Chair lays before the Senate the following…
Public engagement can build trust, it can increase public buy-in, can help resolve issues, can help prevent litigation, and ultimately it can save time and money.
I usually default to the golden rule, and I think in this case it's a pretty good guide as well.





