I am pleased to rise to oppose this legislation for a variety of reasons. First of all, Congress should not discriminate against bankruptcy cases. Virtually all of our laws allow cases to be filed either where the company is headquartered, where their assets are, or where it is incorporated. Why would we want to single out bankruptcy cases for discriminatory treatment? A second point...is that in 1973 Congress voted to restrict options for where bankruptcies could be filed. It was such a failure that Congress repealed the change in 1978. Why would we want to repeal that mistake?
Editor's note · Context
Opposing legislation related to bankruptcy case filing locations during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Michael Castle
I worry that we get too far ahead of ourselves sometimes in terms of what is next instead of how to incorporate what is there.
As we work to reauthorize No Child Left Behind--and I hope we do that in the next few months or year or so--we must work to ensure that students are prepared for college or the workforce when they graduate.
I have an abiding concern what the Federal Government is doing in this area versus what the States are doing.
I rise today to urge support for amendment No. 2 to the CLEAR Act, which will help ensure that there is no delay in the development of ocean renewable energy resources, including offshore wind, under the MMS reorganization called for under…





