On the recordJune 24, 2004
I rise in support of the Kirk substitute and encourage my colleagues to support this compromise approach. I know this is ancient history, but in the 1970s, my home State of Delaware struggled greatly. I know it is a small State, but we were not balancing budgets, we were borrowing money and had the highest tax rate in the United States of America, a 19.8 percent personal income tax rate. In an effort to rectify the situation, the business community got together with then Governor Pete DuPont and decided they had to make procedural changes. These changes included rainy day funds, other set-asides, estimates of revenues, and procedures. These have been in place, and enforced, since then, resulting in a balanced budget every year. In my opinion, the fact that Delaware has a strongly enforced process has led us to have one of the healthiest economic reports of any State in the country. I am particularly pleased that this substitute includes some of the specific provisions that made such a difference in the State of Delaware. But as we all know, the existence of process is not enough. It must be enforced.
Source
govinfo.gov




