My point is that the industry itself is doing this research and development and should do it without a Federal subsidy. I mentioned the full-page ad in today's edition of The Hill newspaper, which says that they are doing this. We shouldn't be subsidizing an industry that's mature and profitable. We need to be spending money on renewable energy sources so that we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Instead, in this continuing resolution, we're cutting $2 billion out of research and development for new energy sources. I don't object to research and development going on for traditional oil and gas industry, but the industry itself ought to be doing that research.
Editor's note · Context
Carney discusses the need for the oil and gas industry to fund its own research and the importance of investing in renewable energy.
Share
More from John Carney
I think Mr. Duffy suggested he agrees with this in his questioning, as well--immediately, because you would be imposing that burden on borrowers who would have to absorb that higher rate.
I would just add some environmental analyses as well as sustainability, in addition to recreation and to the effect on--and equity, which is a hard thing to measure.
If President Trump revokes the current inhumane policy of separating children from their parents, Delaware will be first in line to assist our sister States in securing the border.
I want to thank the gentleman for yielding, and thank him for his hard work on this very serious issue that affects both our States, Delaware and California. Madam Speaker, in a State of 900,000 people, losing 500 jobs is a serious blow…





