Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 1, 2011
earlier this week, the Senate adopted an amendment to the bill we now consider that would, among other things, give the Chief of the National Guard Bureau a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I was a strong supporter of this amendment, as I was its two legislative predecessors, the Guardians of Freedom Act and the National Guard Empowerment and State-National Defense Integration Act. Since then, I have actively lobbied my colleagues to support the measures, and I am glad that this week, so many of them came together to support it. With more than 70 cosponsors from across the political spectrum and ultimately, the unanimous consent of this body, the deep bipartisan support shown for the National Guard this week is not only indicative of the immense respect the brave citizen soldiers of this Nation have earned, but of the extraordinary potential they have for enhancing our national security. A National Guard in one form or another has served our Nation bravely and honorably for 375 years. Their courage is no less respected, their families no less concerned for their well-being. They have done extraordinary work these last 10 years in in Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and in Operation New Dawn. But that is not what this amendment was about. This amendment was not about rewarding what has been done in the past. Rather, it was about recognizing what we need to do for our future in order to keep our country safe.…
Said by
Chris Coons
Democratic · Delaware

Share

More from Chris Coons

Jul 18, 2026

That is correct, in my view, reading of the plain language of the 22nd Amendment.

coons.senate.gov
Jul 21, 2026

If you’re confirmed and you’re asked to take an action you believe to be illegal or unethical, would you resign?

coons.senate.gov
Jul 16, 2026

But given his legal experience, he should have known better than to be willing to tolerate or support the weaponization of the department.

foxnews.com

Other voices in this conversation