On the recordJune 29, 2025
a startling line of attack that was based on arguments at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent.
Editor's note · Context
Barrett criticized Jackson's dissenting opinion as historically unfounded.
Share
More from Amy Coney Barrett
Mar 25, 2025
That seems pretty empty because it would be just kind of throwing a number out there for the sake of throwing a number.
Jun 27, 2025
Under our well-established precedent, the equitable relief available in the federal courts is that ‘traditionally accorded by courts of equity’ at the time of our founding.
Mar 3, 2024
Writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans…
Other voices in this conversation
