Second, if section 5(f)(3) of the bill as amended exempts from the bill's requirement to impose sanctions ``products, technology, or services provided under contracts entered into before the date on which the President publishes in the Federal Register the name of the person on whom the sanctions are to be imposed,'' does this provision mean the sanctions cannot be imposed under section 5(a) or 5(b) on a person for actions taken by that person prior to the publication of that person's name in the Federal Register?
Sam Gejdenson: “Second, if section 5(f)(3) of the bill as amended exempts from the bill's requirement to impose sanctions ``products…”
On the recordJune 18, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a specific provision in a sanctions bill.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
Apr 4, 2000
Today I congratulate the University of Connecticut Women's Basketball team on winning the 2000 NCAA National Championship in outstanding fashion over the Tennessee Lady Volunteers.
Mar 9, 2000
The bill before us today, H.R. 3932, takes some steps in the right direction on pensions.
May 18, 2000
I am sure we would have had a better deal from the North Koreans if the gentleman from Massachusetts had done the negotiation. But since we are lucky to have the gentleman staying in Congress and not going off to work for any…
Mar 9, 2000
This Congress has an obligation to expand pension coverage to boost retirement security for all Americans.





