Second, if section 5(f)(3) of the bill as amended exempts from the bill's requirement to impose sanctions ``products, technology, or services provided under contracts entered into before the date on which the President publishes in the Federal Register the name of the person on whom the sanctions are to be imposed,'' does this provision mean the sanctions cannot be imposed under section 5(a) or 5(b) on a person for actions taken by that person prior to the publication of that person's name in the Federal Register?
Sam Gejdenson: “Second, if section 5(f)(3) of the bill as amended exempts from the bill's requirement to impose sanctions ``products…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a specific provision in a sanctions bill.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
the gentleman from Ohio has one company with a problem in the Palestinian entity. I have a list here that we just in moments put together of 42 countries where American businesses have disputes. If we are going to end our foreign policy…
we are making a critical decision today on whether to grant permanent normal trade relations to China. This is not an easy decision. Before casting my vote, I considered the advice and counsel of my constituents and experts in the field…
in the entire time the United States has spent involved in conflicts around the world, there has never been an instance where our European allies have played as significant a role. Our role here is among the smallest of any engagement that…
I am sure we would have had a better deal from the North Koreans if the gentleman from Massachusetts had done the negotiation. But since we are lucky to have the gentleman staying in Congress and not going off to work for any…





