I guess I would say one thing having been through both Democratic and Republican Presidents, of both parties, I have seen them able to certify almost anything or not certify almost anything they chose to certify or not certify. The other thing is what we are dealing with here, and not questioning anybody, is a political hot potato. If the White House shuts it down, then that becomes obviously significant political fodder. I think in a bipartisan way, and again my hopes for this amendment are not great, but we ought to move past this and engage a much more dynamic policy. Nothing will hurt Castro more than having Cuban-Americans who are successful going back to Cuba and giving a contrast to the life there.
Sam Gejdenson: “I guess I would say one thing having been through both Democratic and Republican Presidents, of both parties, I have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. policy towards Cuba and the impact of Cuban-Americans.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
while I commend the chairman on some of our accomplishments on some of this legislation, there is still a lot left to be done. It seems that we were not able to reverse what has been a damaging impact on America's satellite industry. Since…
Pat is so much more than the Town's record keeper. She is its 'jack-of-all-trades!'
What is clear is that the present policy towards Cuba has failed. What completely leaves us incapable of understanding is why we would ban American travel. Are we fearful that Americans would somehow be beguiled by Castro's political…
What this motion simply does it creates a bipartisan commission to take a look at the best way to take care of our interests in this area. I think it is clear that if we want to diminish Russia's interests in Cuba, if we want to increase…





