I think the honest answer is, however, that this activity we are involved in is not going to lead to a law. It is clear the President said he is going to veto it. It is clear that we do not have the votes to override it. So we are involved in an exercise, but it is not going to affect policy directly. We need to separate these two, both sides, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith), who believes very strongly as he does, has shown his commitment; the President has shown his commitment. The only thing we are doing is avoiding the responsibility to deal with those other issues.
Sam Gejdenson: “I think the honest answer is, however, that this activity we are involved in is not going to lead to a law. It is clear…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the futility of legislative efforts in light of a presidential veto.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
America's workers have made the record 107 month economic expansion possible. They deserve to reap the rewards of our national prosperity.
The bill before us today, H.R. 3932, takes some steps in the right direction on pensions.
I urge rejection of this amendment and the concept that somehow India should be a whipping boy. India should be admired for its great successes in building a democracy in one of the largest and one of the poorest countries with some…
America has led the world in so many areas, but for lots of reasons historically we have failed to do what we have to do in Africa. America responded proudly in Kosovo and other places, in former Yugoslavia. But in Africa, 600,000 to…





