I got this sheet from my colleague here. It is interesting. In 1974, it starts, the Democrats passed campaign finance reform. In 1979, it is a Republican filibuster. In 1988, it is a GOP filibuster. In 1991, Bush promises a veto. In 1992, Bush vetoes. In 1993, Senate Republicans filibuster. In 1996, Republicans filibuster. There is a difference in the two parties. Democrats have generally been for this. Not perfect, but for this. And the very sheet my colleague brought up here time and time again talks about Republicans filibustering and killing the process, and I would say the gentleman's bill would kill the process again. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Sam Gejdenson: “I got this sheet from my colleague here. It is interesting. In 1974, it starts, the Democrats passed campaign finance…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the history of campaign finance reform and party positions during a debate.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
first of all, we are not talking about forgiveness here as much as rescheduling, which is again in our interest. If they default at some point, that hurts us, the lenders. Additionally, does the gentlewoman think that our present policy…
it is time for the conferees to move forward with a patients' bill of rights. The leadership of this Chamber, which has blocked the legislation for years now, has to recognize that the American people are rightly demanding that their…
America has led the world in so many areas, but for lots of reasons historically we have failed to do what we have to do in Africa. America responded proudly in Kosovo and other places, in former Yugoslavia. But in Africa, 600,000 to…
The connection between Sierra Leone and Connecticut is an old one, starting with the Amistad. It is sad to see the continued torture of the citizens of Sierra Leone, and therefore, the little effort that we are putting forth here, the…





