The Second Amendment does not provide the right to carry a concealed firearm.

I do not believe it is, but you are the professor. So let me ask you.

I am pro-life. The judges will be pro-life.

I happen to think this kind of process is a lot healthier for our democracy than the 90 minutes...

I mentioned the distinction that there was in Judge Gorsuch's comments on the privacy cases versus Brown in the way that he acknowledged that the privacy cases were decisions of the Court, and he declined to say whether or not he thought…

I will continue to work as hard and long as possible for common sense measures that will stop gun violence in this country.

No right being absolute, public safety being a legitimate consideration, is one with which you would agree?

You have been less forthcoming, less direct and specific than I hoped.

He was the elephant in the room with us then. I think he is the elephant in the room with us now.

The problem is with the theory that, if honestly applied, does not get there.

Actually, Chief Justice Warren asked Justice Frankfurter to find an originalist justification for Brown.

I hope that you will be as persuasive as possible after you make up your own mind and hope that you will decide that these rules make sense.

Do you recall that tweet?

the purpose of those laws is to protect workers' health and safety.

And during the campaign, a completely different Federal judge, born in this country, he said could not rule fairly on his case because the judge was 'a Mexican.'

It is a great and important decision.

No person is above the law, including the President of the United States.

describing those purposes as ephemeral and generic.

Liberty finds no refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt.

The ultimate test of the rule of law is whether the Government can lose in its own courts and accept the judgments of those courts.

No right is absolute under the Constitution. Is that a correct statement?

The fact that this country has failed to stop the sale of such weapons and impose commonsense measures like universal background checks is absolutely reprehensible.

It was decided in 1965, and that was its holding, and I am asking you do you believe it was the right result?

There is an elephant in the room with us today.

Nothing in Heller was intended to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill.