The premise of H.R. 2667, the employer mandate bill, which is part of the rule here today, is that somehow the administration overreached by announcing this postponement of the employer tax measure which was part of the Affordable Care Act. The fact of the matter is, if the proponents had picked up the phone and called the Congressional Research Service and asked them if the IRS has postponed imposition of statutorily required requirements, the fact of the matter, they would have found out what I hold in my hand, which is a memo that was issued today that cites four examples, just within the last 2 or 3 years, where the IRS delayed statutory reporting requirements because of the fact that comments from private sector voices around the country warned that it needed more time to be implemented. The 2006 law imposing a 3 percent withholding requirement effective December 31, 2010, was delayed till 2012. The 2009 Worker Home Ownership and Business Assistance Act was delayed for a year for a statutory electronic filing requirement. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Withholding Act was postponed 2 years, again, because of a comment that came in from the private sector.…
On the recordJuly 17, 2013
Share
More from Joe Courtney
Sep 9, 2025
this is documentary proof that the concern that is being raised with this amendment is something that is already part of the permitting process. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management signed off on the project. Again, we are about $4…
Mar 24, 2026
this is incredibly problematic and entirely unjustifiable. Put simply, there is no reason for Congress to actively remove these protections for those fighters who choose to sign with the UBO, and there is no reason for a UBO to be exempt…
Jun 11, 2024
Again, could you comment, again, on that ruling, which actually was about restoring a 40-year precedent...
Sep 9, 2024
the Republicans' extreme 'Project 2025' policy agenda proposes to repeal this program and put billions in the pockets of big pharma.





