this is incredibly problematic and entirely unjustifiable. Put simply, there is no reason for Congress to actively remove these protections for those fighters who choose to sign with the UBO, and there is no reason for a UBO to be exempt from complying with these protective measures. Mr. Speaker, lastly, Patrick English, who testified before the committee, rebutted the myth that boxing is dying. Mr. Speaker, cable is dying, but boxing is signing very lucrative contracts with streaming services.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing protections for fighters in relation to the UBO during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Joe Courtney
We are now in the eighth week of the 119th Congress, which has distinguished itself with incredibly low productivity and low effort. So far, we have brought up just a bunch of moldy old leftovers from the last Congress. We have been…
as this headline on the whiteboard proclaims, we in New England received welcomed news on Friday that, after years of hard work and massive investments by both the private sector and the government, a new, reliable source of energy for our…
Again, could you comment, again, on that ruling, which actually was about restoring a 40-year precedent...
Again, I would just like to ask all the other witnesses, the simple question yes or no, do you think Congress should reduce the tax-exempt status of health care--employer-sponsored health plans?





