If we understand section 1189 correctly, nothing in S. 612 gives any States any new rights by which to impose its own water quality standards on any other State. Rather, section 1189 is simply a restatement of current law under the Clean Water Act. Additionally, we understand that no provision in this bill revises the Army Corps' Federal standard of dredged material from Federal projects; and as is affirmed through a sense of Congress in section 1188 of this bill, the best way to resolve any disagreements over State water quality standards is collaboratively with input from all stakeholders. Is that a correct reading of the bill?
Joe Courtney: “If we understand section 1189 correctly, nothing in S. 612 gives any States any new rights by which to impose its own…”
On the recordDecember 8, 2016
Share
More from Joe Courtney
Mar 24, 2026
This is incredibly problematic and entirely unjustifiable. Put simply, there is no reason for Congress to actively remove these protections for those fighters who choose to sign with the UBO, and there is no reason for a UBO to be exempt…
Mar 24, 2026
This bill does not have consensus support from those its proponents claim. Again, as has been stated by Ms. Omar, I join with her in calling on the Senate to continue to work on this bill and focus on the achievements of Senator McCain in…
Oct 2, 2026
There is still much work to be done, but Congressional support is strong to move the spent fuel initiative that has occurred over multiple administrations.





